Brown v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2004] FCA 1365

Brown v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2004] FCA 1365

The application was dismissed because all claims advanced by the applicant failed: the claim under the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standard) Act 1999 (Cth) was time-barred by s 116(6); the claims under ss 52, 53, and 74 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) lacked evidentiary basis and were not substantiated.

Parties
Applicant: William Francis Brown; Respondent: Telstra Corporation Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 November 2004
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Telecommunications (consumer Protection and Service Standard) Act 1999 (cth), Trade Practices Act 1974 (cth), Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, False Representations, Implied Warranty of Fitness, Statutory Damages, Limitation Periods
Administrative Law Consumer Protection Law Contract Law Telecommunications (consumer Protection and Service Standard) Act 1999 (cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (cth) Misleading or Deceptive Conduct False Representations Implied Warranty of Fitness +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Francis Brown

Applicant

Telstra Corporation Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's claim for statutory damages under s 116 of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standard) Act 1999 (Cth) is time-barred
  2. 2 Whether the respondent engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct or made false representations contrary to ss 52 and 53 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
  3. 3 Whether the respondent breached an implied warranty of fitness under s 74 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because all claims advanced by the applicant failed: the claim under the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standard) Act 1999 (Cth) was time-barred by s 116(6); the claims under ss 52, 53, and 74 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) lacked evidentiary basis and were not substantiated.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application be dismissed.