R v Denney [2001] NSWCCA 281
The sentencing judge did not err in fixing sentences for each offence, considered principle of totality, and was justified in finding no special circumstances; while the judge's remarks about minimal consideration for guilty pleas were ambiguous, sentencing was ultimately appropriate given the applicant's record and circumstances, with proper allowance for early guilty pleas; leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'plea Discount' 'principle of Totality' 'special Circumstances' 'manifest Excess']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge gave due weight to early guilty pleas' 'Whether sentences were manifestly excessive' 'Whether sentencing followed principles in Pearce v The Queen' 'Whether special circumstances warranted a longer parole opportunity']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not err in fixing sentences for each offence, considered principle of totality, and was justified in finding no special circumstances; while the judge's remarks about minimal consideration for guilty pleas were ambiguous, sentencing was ultimately appropriate given the applicant's record and circumstances, with proper allowance for early guilty pleas; leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment