Yirrell v Yirrell [1939] HCA 33

Yirrell v Yirrell [1939] HCA 33

The Children's Court of New South Wales had no jurisdiction to make an order for maintenance against the appellant as the complaint alleged that the wife had been left without support in Victoria, not New South Wales. This lack of jurisdiction appeared on the face of the complaint, and thus on the face of proceedings. The appellant was entitled to a writ of prohibition as of right.

Parties
Appellant: William Green Yirrell; Respondent: Lillian Ethel Yirrell; Complainant/respondent: Neville Kingsbury Purcell Cohen; Special Magistrate/respondent: Arthur Blix
Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court)
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Maintenance, Wife and Children Support, Prerogative Writs, Jurisdiction of Inferior Courts, Prohibition
Family Law Jurisdiction Procedure Maintenance Wife and Children Support Prerogative Writs Jurisdiction of Inferior Courts Prohibition

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 36 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Green Yirrell

Appellant

Lillian Ethel Yirrell

Respondent

Neville Kingsbury Purcell Cohen

Complainant/respondent

Arthur Blix

Special Magistrate/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Children's Court of New South Wales had jurisdiction to make an order for maintenance when the alleged dereliction occurred outside New South Wales
  2. 2 Whether want of jurisdiction appeared on the face of the proceedings so as to entitle the applicant to prohibition as of right

Ratio Decidendi

The Children's Court of New South Wales had no jurisdiction to make an order for maintenance against the appellant as the complaint alleged that the wife had been left without support in Victoria, not New South Wales. This lack of jurisdiction appeared on the face of the complaint, and thus on the face of proceedings. The appellant was entitled to a writ of prohibition as of right.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order of Supreme Court of New South Wales set aside except as to costs
  • Order absolute for writ of prohibition