Stedman v O'Hearn;Hosemans v O'Hearn [2006] NSWSC 1122
Where one co-executor claims family provision against the estate, it is appropriate for the court to make an order appointing the remaining co-executor as representative of the estate for the proceedings, pursuant to r 7.10 of the UCPR, rather than requiring the executor-plaintiff to renounce probate or be removed.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: William Henry Stedman; Defendant: Patricia O'Hearn; Plaintiff: Rachel Jade Hosemans; Defendant: William Henry Stedman
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Act Proceedings / Interlocutory Motion Before Trial
- Outcome
- Representative order made for estate representation by defendant; costs of motion to be paid out of estate.
- Legal Topics
- Representative Orders, Executor Conflict of Interest, Family Provision Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Henry Stedman
Plaintiff
Patricia O'Hearn
Defendant
Rachel Jade Hosemans
Plaintiff
William Henry Stedman
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Act Proceedings / Interlocutory Motion Before Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an executor who is a plaintiff in Family Provision Act proceedings must renounce probate or be removed as executor
- 2 Whether a representative order is necessary when an executor brings a claim adverse to the estate
Ratio Decidendi
Where one co-executor claims family provision against the estate, it is appropriate for the court to make an order appointing the remaining co-executor as representative of the estate for the proceedings, pursuant to r 7.10 of the UCPR, rather than requiring the executor-plaintiff to renounce probate or be removed.
Court Disposition
Representative order made for estate representation by defendant; costs of motion to be paid out of estate.
Orders
- In 5122/04, the defendant is appointed to represent the estate of the deceased for the purposes of the proceedings.
- The costs of each party of the motion in 5122/04 are to be paid out of the estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment