Kessell Nominal v Leech [1932] HCA 38
The landlord's undertaking operated as a postponement and effective waiver of his statutory right under section 6 in favour of the Minister’s right under the preferential lien, entitling the Crown to satisfy its debt before any payment of rent to the landlord.
- Parties
- Appellant: William James Kessell (Nominal Defendant); Respondent: John Leech
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Crop Liens, Landlord Statutory Rights, Waiver of Statutory Rights, Effect of Undertakings, Priority of Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William James Kessell (Nominal Defendant)
Appellant
John Leech
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a landlord’s undertaking to admit the Minister for Agriculture to a first claim on crops waives statutory rights under sec. 6 of the Liens on Crops and Wool and Stock Mortgages Act 1898 (N.S.W.)
- 2 Whether the landlord is entitled to payment of one year’s rent from crop proceeds under sec. 6 when an undertaking is given
Ratio Decidendi
The landlord's undertaking operated as a postponement and effective waiver of his statutory right under section 6 in favour of the Minister’s right under the preferential lien, entitling the Crown to satisfy its debt before any payment of rent to the landlord.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs in the High Court and in the Supreme Court
- Verdict of the District Court restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment