Weal V Bathurst City Council & Anor [1999] NSWLEC 217

Weal V Bathurst City Council & Anor [1999] NSWLEC 217

The published reasons for judgment should be varied by deleting paragraph 100, as the parties consented and the paragraph referred to evidence not ultimately admitted; the correction is minor and does not affect the judgment's substance.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 September 1999
Procedural Posture
Supplemental Judgment / Post Judgment Correction
Outcome
Paragraph 100 of the reasons for judgment delivered 11 June 1999 is deleted.
Legal Topics
['supplemental Judgment' 'correction of Judgment' 'slip Rule' 'admission of Evidence']
['practice and Procedure'] ['supplemental Judgment' 'correction of Judgment' 'slip Rule' 'admission of Evidence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Supplemental Judgment / Post Judgment Correction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether paragraph 100 of the reasons for judgment should be deleted to correct an unintended reference to evidence not admitted']

Ratio Decidendi

The published reasons for judgment should be varied by deleting paragraph 100, as the parties consented and the paragraph referred to evidence not ultimately admitted; the correction is minor and does not affect the judgment's substance.

Court Disposition

Paragraph 100 of the reasons for judgment delivered 11 June 1999 is deleted.

Orders

  • ['Paragraph 100 of the reasons for judgment published on 11 June 1999 is deleted.']