Lyons v Sutherland Shire Council & Ors [2001] NSWCA 430
The delegated officer acted outside the scope of his authority by granting development consent in the presence of well-founded objections that could not be reasonably satisfied and related to matters which constituted reasonable grounds for refusal, making the consent invalid.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; development consent declared invalid
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'delegated Authority' 'heritage Impact' 'well Founded Objections' 'planning Law']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the delegated authority to grant development consent was exceeded' 'Whether the development consent granted is invalid due to relevant and well-founded objections' 'Proper construction and effect of the delegation instrument regarding development consent']
Ratio Decidendi
The delegated officer acted outside the scope of his authority by granting development consent in the presence of well-founded objections that could not be reasonably satisfied and related to matters which constituted reasonable grounds for refusal, making the consent invalid.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; development consent declared invalid
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed' 'Judgment and orders of Sheahan J set aside' 'Declare that the development consent granted by the first respondent to the second respondents and dated 4 August 1999 is invalid' "Respondents to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and at first instance and have a certificate under the Suitors'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment