Murray v The Queen [2002] HCA 26

Murray v The Queen [2002] HCA 26

The trial judge misdirected the jury by framing the issue as one of accepting the appellant's version of events, instead of properly directing that the prosecution must exclude the appellant's account beyond reasonable doubt. This misdirection potentially relieved the prosecution of proving its case to the required standard, amounting to a material miscarriage of justice and necessitating the quashing of the conviction and an order for a new trial.

Parties
Appellant: William John Murray; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 June 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the High Court From the Court of Appeal of Queensland
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Homicide, Murder, Unlawful Killing, Onus of Proof, Jury Directions, Unwilled Act, Accident Under the Criminal Code (q)
Criminal Law Homicide Murder Unlawful Killing Onus of Proof Jury Directions Unwilled Act Accident Under the Criminal Code (q)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William John Murray

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the High Court From the Court of Appeal of Queensland

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in failing to direct the jury about unwilled acts under s 23(1)(a) of the Criminal Code (Q)
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in directions regarding the onus of proof
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge's directions on accident or event under s 23(1)(b) were necessary or sufficient

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge misdirected the jury by framing the issue as one of accepting the appellant's version of events, instead of properly directing that the prosecution must exclude the appellant's account beyond reasonable doubt. This misdirection potentially relieved the prosecution of proving its case to the required standard, amounting to a material miscarriage of justice and necessitating the quashing of the conviction and an order for a new trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Appeal allowed.
  • Set aside the order of the Court of Appeal of Queensland dated 24 August 1999.