Parsons v R [1957] HCA 75
'Capital offence' in s. 55(2) of the Jury Act 1912-1951 (N.S.W.) refers to offences punishable by death at the time of trial, not at the time of the Act's enactment. Since the Crimes (Amendment) Act 1955 (N.S.W.) replaced the death penalty for murder with penal servitude for life, murder ceased to be a capital offence, and the applicant was entitled only to eight peremptory challenges.
- Parties
- Applicant: William John Parsons; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Leave to Appeal (criminal) / Application to the High Court From the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Special leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Peremptory Challenges, Interpretation of 'capital Offence', Penal Servitude Versus Capital Punishment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William John Parsons
Applicant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Leave to Appeal (criminal) / Application to the High Court From the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to twenty peremptory challenges under s. 55(2) of the Jury Act 1912-1951 (N.S.W.) upon trial for murder after the abolition of the death penalty by Crimes (Amendment) Act 1955 (N.S.W.)
- 2 Whether 'capital offence' in s. 55(2) refers to offences formerly but not currently punishable by death
Ratio Decidendi
'Capital offence' in s. 55(2) of the Jury Act 1912-1951 (N.S.W.) refers to offences punishable by death at the time of trial, not at the time of the Act's enactment. Since the Crimes (Amendment) Act 1955 (N.S.W.) replaced the death penalty for murder with penal servitude for life, murder ceased to be a capital offence, and the applicant was entitled only to eight peremptory challenges.
Court Disposition
Special leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- Application for special leave to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment