Stone v Stone [2008] NSWSC 1134

Stone v Stone [2008] NSWSC 1134

The Plaintiff, as an adult son subsisting on a disability pension with limited assets and substantial liabilities, had not been left adequate provision for his proper maintenance under the will and codicil; a further legacy of $60,000 was justified considering the Plaintiff’s needs and the size of the estate, despite the Defendant’s competing claim to reside in the property.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 October 2008
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Claim / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim upheld, further provision ordered for Plaintiff
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'adequate Provision for Maintenance' 'competing Beneficiary Claims']
['succession Law'] ['family Provision' 'adequate Provision for Maintenance' 'competing Beneficiary Claims']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Claim / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Plaintiff has been left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance from the estate' 'Whether a further legacy should be made to the Plaintiff in addition to that provided by the will and codicil']

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff, as an adult son subsisting on a disability pension with limited assets and substantial liabilities, had not been left adequate provision for his proper maintenance under the will and codicil; a further legacy of $60,000 was justified considering the Plaintiff’s needs and the size of the estate, despite the Defendant’s competing claim to reside in the property.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld, further provision ordered for Plaintiff

Orders

  • ['Plaintiff to receive further legacy of $60,000 from the estate, not bearing interest if paid on or before 29 December 2008, otherwise to bear interest as per Probate and Administration Act 1898.' 'Costs of Plaintiff (party and party) and Defendant (indemnity) to be paid out of the estate of the Deceased.'...