KAMM, William v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 290

KAMM, William v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 290

Counsel's tactical decisions in response to witness allegations did not result in unfairness or miscarriage of justice; challenged cross-examinations by the Crown were relevant, probative, and not offensive; the trial judge's rulings on probative value and prejudice were correct.

Parties
Applicant: William Kamm; Respondent: The Crown
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 December 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Miscarriage of Justice, Cross Examination, Witness Credibility, Destruction of Documents, Prejudice
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Miscarriage of Justice Cross Examination Witness Credibility Destruction of Documents Prejudice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Kamm

Applicant

The Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a miscarriage of justice occurred due to allegations against counsel regarding destruction of documents.
  2. 2 Whether cross-examination by Crown Prosecutor caused unfair prejudice to the appellant.
  3. 3 Whether certain questions to witnesses lacked substantive probative value or were offensive.

Ratio Decidendi

Counsel's tactical decisions in response to witness allegations did not result in unfairness or miscarriage of justice; challenged cross-examinations by the Crown were relevant, probative, and not offensive; the trial judge's rulings on probative value and prejudice were correct.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed