Karavelas v Georges River Council [2017] NSWLEC 1414
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; the proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with that agreed decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Modification Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; consent granted to the modification application; development consent 78/2016 made subject to consolidated conditions of consent at Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'development Consent' 'section 94 Contributions' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Modification Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement reached at or after a conciliation conference under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether consent should be granted to modify development application no. 9/2016/78/1 to amend condition 4 and delete conditions 13, 14 and 15 for 19-23 Bembridge Street, Carlton NSW 2218.']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; the proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with that agreed decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; consent granted to the modification application; development consent 78/2016 made subject to consolidated conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans and documents as referred to in the conditions of consent contained in Annexure "A" and included at Annexure "B".' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Consent is granted to application no. 9/2016/78/2 for the modification of a development application no 9/2016/78/1...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment