Steele v Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Board (No 2) [1956] HCA 4

Steele v Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Board (No 2) [1956] HCA 4

The Board was entitled to reclassify the appellant based on his demonstrated ability to perform duties as a permanent officer of the Commonwealth Public Service; the proportion of his incapacity in relation to civil employment was appropriately reassessed at less than thirty percent, regardless of unchanged physical disability, because s. 51 looks to general, not just occupational, capacity.

Parties
Appellant: William Kayle Steele; Respondents: Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Board and another
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 February 1956
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Appeal to High Court Pursuant to S. 83 of Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Act 1948 1952
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs, except that the specific conviction under s. 210(1)(d) is quashed. Reclassification by Board upheld. Pension terminated from 25 June 1953.
Legal Topics
Disability Reclassification, Pension Entitlement, Scope of Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Kayle Steele

Appellant

Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Board and another

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment After Appeal to High Court Pursuant to S. 83 of Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Act 1948 1952

  1. 1 Whether the reclassification of the appellant under s. 53(1) of the Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Act 1948-1952 was valid without alteration in physical disability
  2. 2 The meaning and scope of 'percentage of total incapacity...in relation to civil employment' under s. 51

Ratio Decidendi

The Board was entitled to reclassify the appellant based on his demonstrated ability to perform duties as a permanent officer of the Commonwealth Public Service; the proportion of his incapacity in relation to civil employment was appropriately reassessed at less than thirty percent, regardless of unchanged physical disability, because s. 51 looks to general, not just occupational, capacity.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs, except that the specific conviction under s. 210(1)(d) is quashed. Reclassification by Board upheld. Pension terminated from 25 June 1953.

Orders

  • Conviction under s. 210(1)(d) of Bankruptcy Act 1924-1950 quashed.
  • Other convictions and sentences confirmed.