Steele v Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Board (No 2) [1956] HCA 4
The Board was entitled to reclassify the appellant based on his demonstrated ability to perform duties as a permanent officer of the Commonwealth Public Service; the proportion of his incapacity in relation to civil employment was appropriately reassessed at less than thirty percent, regardless of unchanged physical disability, because s. 51 looks to general, not just occupational, capacity.
- Parties
- Appellant: William Kayle Steele; Respondents: Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Board and another
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 1956
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Appeal to High Court Pursuant to S. 83 of Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Act 1948 1952
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, except that the specific conviction under s. 210(1)(d) is quashed. Reclassification by Board upheld. Pension terminated from 25 June 1953.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Reclassification, Pension Entitlement, Scope of Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Kayle Steele
Appellant
Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Board and another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Appeal to High Court Pursuant to S. 83 of Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Act 1948 1952
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reclassification of the appellant under s. 53(1) of the Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Act 1948-1952 was valid without alteration in physical disability
- 2 The meaning and scope of 'percentage of total incapacity...in relation to civil employment' under s. 51
Ratio Decidendi
The Board was entitled to reclassify the appellant based on his demonstrated ability to perform duties as a permanent officer of the Commonwealth Public Service; the proportion of his incapacity in relation to civil employment was appropriately reassessed at less than thirty percent, regardless of unchanged physical disability, because s. 51 looks to general, not just occupational, capacity.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, except that the specific conviction under s. 210(1)(d) is quashed. Reclassification by Board upheld. Pension terminated from 25 June 1953.
Orders
- Conviction under s. 210(1)(d) of Bankruptcy Act 1924-1950 quashed.
- Other convictions and sentences confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment