Aero Marine Consulting Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1016

Aero Marine Consulting Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1016

Mr Cain was not a relevant person within s 267(1) at the time the charge was created because he effectively resigned as director and secretary prior to 29 September 2002 by mutual agreement and accepted conduct, notwithstanding the lack of a formal written resignation. Further, the service of the Notice of Default on 22 July 2003 constituted enforcement for the purposes of s 441A, bringing the company’s administration within s 442D. Accordingly, the charge and the appointment of the receiver and manager are valid and enforceable, and the administrator's powers are subject to those of the receiver and manager.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Corporations Law/administration Proceedings / Final Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Declaration that the charge and appointment of receiver and manager are valid and enforceable, and that the administrator's powers are subject to those of the receiver and manager.
Legal Topics
['enforcement of Charge' 'voluntary Administration' 'director Resignation' 'receiver and Manager Appointment' 's 267 Corporations Act 2001 (cth)' 's 441 a and S 442 D Corporations Act 2001 (cth)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Law/administration Proceedings / Final Judgment at First Instance

  1. 1 ['Whether Mr Cain had ceased to be a director and secretary of AMC prior to creation of the charge for the purposes of s 267(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' 'Whether the appointment of the receiver and manager was valid and effective' 'Whether AMC’s administration is subject to the powers of the receiver and manager under s 441A(1) and s 442D of the Act' 'Whether the service of a Notice of Default constituted enforcement of the charge']

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Cain was not a relevant person within s 267(1) at the time the charge was created because he effectively resigned as director and secretary prior to 29 September 2002 by mutual agreement and accepted conduct, notwithstanding the lack of a formal written resignation. Further, the service of the Notice of Default on 22 July 2003 constituted enforcement for the purposes of s 441A, bringing the company’s administration within s 442D. Accordingly, the charge and the appointment of the receiver and manager are valid and enforceable, and the administrator's powers are subject to those of the receiver and manager.

Court Disposition

Declaration that the charge and appointment of receiver and manager are valid and enforceable, and that the administrator's powers are subject to those of the receiver and manager.

Orders

  • []