REGINA v. MACADAM-KELLIE [2001] NSWCCA 170
The trial judge fell into error by not accepting the link between the applicant’s major depressive illness and the commission of the offence as established by further psychiatric evidence; as a result, insufficient weight was given to the impact of that illness in mitigation, requiring re-sentencing with appropriate allowance for the mental condition, discount for the plea, and the objective seriousness of the offence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence From District Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; re-sentence imposed.
- Legal Topics
- ['attempted Murder' 'sentencing' 'effect of Mental Illness' 'fresh Evidence' 'apprehended Violence Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence From District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentence imposed was excessive in light of the applicant's mental illness and other subjective factors" 'Whether the trial judge erred by not adequately considering psychiatric evidence linking major depression with the commission of the offence' 'Whether sufficient discount was allowed for the guilty plea, contrition, and special circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge fell into error by not accepting the link between the applicant’s major depressive illness and the commission of the offence as established by further psychiatric evidence; as a result, insufficient weight was given to the impact of that illness in mitigation, requiring re-sentencing with appropriate allowance for the mental condition, discount for the plea, and the objective seriousness of the offence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; re-sentence imposed.
Orders
- ['Sentence of 16 years quashed.' 'In lieu, sentenced to 15 years imprisonment to commence 24 February 1999 and expire 23 February 2014.' 'Non-parole period of 11 years to expire 23 February 2010.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment