Matheson v R [2015] NSWCCA 108
A two-stage approach to sentencing which takes the standard non-parole period as a starting point is erroneous per Muldrock v R. As such error was established, the Court was required to resentence afresh and, considering all circumstances, reduced the balance of term, quashing the original sentence and imposing imprisonment with a non-parole period of 18 years and a balance of term of 7 years.
- Parties
- Applicant: William Matheson; Respondent: Regina (Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence quashed and re-sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Appeal, Murder, Standard Non Parole Period, Mental Illness, Muldrock Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Matheson
Applicant
Regina (Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a 'Muldrock error' occurred in sentencing the applicant
- 2 Whether an extension of time for leave to appeal should be granted
- 3 Whether a lesser sentence is warranted in law
Ratio Decidendi
A two-stage approach to sentencing which takes the standard non-parole period as a starting point is erroneous per Muldrock v R. As such error was established, the Court was required to resentence afresh and, considering all circumstances, reduced the balance of term, quashing the original sentence and imposing imprisonment with a non-parole period of 18 years and a balance of term of 7 years.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence quashed and re-sentenced
Orders
- An extension of time for the application for leave to appeal against sentence is granted.
- Leave is granted to appeal against sentence and the appeal is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment