William Norman George v R [2016] NSWDC 59
The police lawfully requested the appellant's identity after a reasonable suspicion of an offence. The appellant's refusal constituted a breach of s 12 LEPRA and justified arrest. The evidence established both the required intent for obstructing the police vehicle and the offence of resisting police. The sentence imposed was within discretion and not excessive.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence, Rehearing on Transcript
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['police Powers of Arrest' 'obstructing Police' 'resisting Arrest' 'lawfulness of Arrest' 'reasonable Grounds for Arrest']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence, Rehearing on Transcript
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the arrest of the appellant was unlawful due to invalid police demand for identification' 'Whether the offences of obstructing vehicle and resisting police were proved beyond reasonable doubt' 'Whether the sentencing was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The police lawfully requested the appellant's identity after a reasonable suspicion of an offence. The appellant's refusal constituted a breach of s 12 LEPRA and justified arrest. The evidence established both the required intent for obstructing the police vehicle and the offence of resisting police. The sentence imposed was within discretion and not excessive.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal is dismissed' 'Orders made by the learned Magistrate on 27 November 2015 are confirmed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment