Tulloch v Manly Council [2008] NSWLEC 1368
The amended proposal, by reducing scale, height, and excavation, and incorporating mature tree replacement, satisfactorily meets the control objectives for bulk, scale, amenity, landscaping, and view sharing without causing unacceptable adverse impacts. Conditional consent is thus warranted.
- Parties
- Applicant: William Paul Tulloch; Respondent: Manly Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Development consent conditionally granted.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Residential Zoning, Floor Space Ratio (fsr), Height Controls, Excavation Limits, Tree Removal, View Impact, Side Setbacks
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Paul Tulloch
Applicant
Manly Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed development complies with FSR, height, excavation, side setback and other planning controls
- 2 Impact of the proposed development on neighbouring amenity, views, and vegetation, especially Tree 7 (Angophora costata)
- 3 Appropriate application of view sharing principles and landscaping requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The amended proposal, by reducing scale, height, and excavation, and incorporating mature tree replacement, satisfactorily meets the control objectives for bulk, scale, amenity, landscaping, and view sharing without causing unacceptable adverse impacts. Conditional consent is thus warranted.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Development consent conditionally granted.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development consent is granted to DA No 373/06 for the demolition of an existing dwelling and carport and construction of a new dwelling house and swimming pool at 11 Barrabooka Street Clontarf subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment