Pomplun v Shoalhaven City Council [2010] NSWADT 113

Pomplun v Shoalhaven City Council [2010] NSWADT 113

The Tribunal found that none of the applicant’s complaints identified treatment which would constitute actionable discrimination under the Anti-Discrimination Act, 1977, as neither the requisite detriment nor any real link to age, sex, or marital status was established. Thus, the complaints lacked substance and it would not be fair or just to grant leave for proceedings.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Proceed (equal Opportunity/discrimination) / Decision on Leave to Proceed
Outcome
Leave to proceed refused.
Legal Topics
['age Discrimination' 'sex Discrimination' 'marital Status Discrimination' 'procedural Discretion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Proceed (equal Opportunity/discrimination) / Decision on Leave to Proceed

  1. 1 ["Whether the applicant's complaints of age, sex, and marital status discrimination have sufficient substance to warrant leave to proceed before the Tribunal."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that none of the applicant’s complaints identified treatment which would constitute actionable discrimination under the Anti-Discrimination Act, 1977, as neither the requisite detriment nor any real link to age, sex, or marital status was established. Thus, the complaints lacked substance and it would not be fair or just to grant leave for proceedings.

Court Disposition

Leave to proceed refused.

Orders

  • ['Leave is refused for the complaint of age discrimination.' 'Leave is refused for the complaint of sex discrimination.' 'Leave is refused for the complaint of marital status discrimination.']