Corney v Brien [1951] HCA 31

Corney v Brien [1951] HCA 31

The evidence did not establish that Brien was the real creditor or that there was a valid debt underlying the judgment. There was no evidence Brien provided consideration for the alleged agreement or that Corney and Irvine were bound to pay Brien. Therefore, the sequestration order based on the judgment debt could not stand, and the bankruptcy petition must be dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: William Raymond Corney; Respondent: John Cyril Brien
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 June 1951
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Court of Bankruptcy
Outcome
Appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
Sequestration Order, Judgment Debt, Court Power to Go Behind Judgment
Bankruptcy Sequestration Order Judgment Debt Court Power to Go Behind Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Raymond Corney

Appellant

John Cyril Brien

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Court of Bankruptcy

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a real debt underlying the judgment debt claimed by the petitioning creditor
  2. 2 Whether the Court of Bankruptcy ought to go behind a judgment obtained by default
  3. 3 Whether Brien was a real creditor regarding the debt in question

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not establish that Brien was the real creditor or that there was a valid debt underlying the judgment. There was no evidence Brien provided consideration for the alleged agreement or that Corney and Irvine were bound to pay Brien. Therefore, the sequestration order based on the judgment debt could not stand, and the bankruptcy petition must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed.

Orders

  • Sequestration order set aside.
  • Bankruptcy petition dismissed with costs.