Ell v Milne (No 9) [2014] NSWSC 489
Neither party acted unreasonably during negotiations; the apologies offered by the defendant were genuine but did not achieve a better result than litigation. Plaintiff was successful but did not give evidence and was not awarded damages for hurt feelings; publication was limited. The circumstances, including the plaintiff’s conduct, did not warrant awarding costs to either party. Each party to bear his or her own costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Costs Determination After Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Each party to bear his or her own costs of the proceedings
- Legal Topics
- ['apology' 'limited Circulation Publication' 'damages' 'settlement Offers' 'qualified Privilege' 'truth Defence' 'contextual Truth Defence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Costs Determination After Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether acceptance of defendant's offer to publish an apology would have achieved a better result than litigation" 'Whether plaintiff is entitled to costs after not giving evidence and failing to obtain an award for hurt feelings' 'Whether the claim was cynically motivated']
Ratio Decidendi
Neither party acted unreasonably during negotiations; the apologies offered by the defendant were genuine but did not achieve a better result than litigation. Plaintiff was successful but did not give evidence and was not awarded damages for hurt feelings; publication was limited. The circumstances, including the plaintiff’s conduct, did not warrant awarding costs to either party. Each party to bear his or her own costs.
Court Disposition
Each party to bear his or her own costs of the proceedings
Orders
- ['Each party bear his or her own costs of the proceedings']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment