William Robert Ell v Katie Milne [2011] NSWSC 645
The particulars provided for the defences of truth and contextual truth are inadequate; the specific contextual imputation based on electoral fraud is incapable of standing as pleaded; the defendant must provide proper particulars; and the electoral fraud contextual imputation is struck out with leave to replead.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Strike Out or Provide Particulars of Defence
- Outcome
- Defendant ordered to provide proper particulars, contextual imputation of electoral fraud struck out with leave to replead
- Legal Topics
- ['defences to Defamation' 'particulars of Truth' 'contextual Truth' 'qualified Privilege' 'pleading Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Strike Out or Provide Particulars of Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether particulars of the defences of truth and contextual truth are adequate' 'Whether contextual imputations pleaded are capable of arising from the publication and adequately particularised' 'Whether the provision of bail or association with McGurk is capable of being defamatory or scandalous association' 'Whether allegations of political donations can constitute contextual imputations']
Ratio Decidendi
The particulars provided for the defences of truth and contextual truth are inadequate; the specific contextual imputation based on electoral fraud is incapable of standing as pleaded; the defendant must provide proper particulars; and the electoral fraud contextual imputation is struck out with leave to replead.
Court Disposition
Defendant ordered to provide proper particulars, contextual imputation of electoral fraud struck out with leave to replead
Orders
- ['The defendant provide proper particulars of the defence of truth pleaded in paragraph 7 of the defence.' 'The defendant provide proper particulars of the defence of contextual truth based on the contextual imputation pleaded in paragraph 8(a)(i) of the defence.' 'The contextual imputation pleaded in paragraph...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment