Davison v Legal Profession Admission Board [2019] NSWSC 959
Mr Davison failed to demonstrate genuine insight into or acceptance of the seriousness of his prior conduct, characterised by a deliberate strategy to avoid tax and bankruptcy obligations over an extended period, as found by prior tribunals and courts. He continued to provide exculpatory explanations and did not positively show a reformed character warranting reinstatement. The court was not satisfied that he was a fit and proper person for readmission, and thus his appeal must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['admission to Practice' 'fit and Proper Person' 'professional Misconduct' 'readmission to Legal Profession']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff is a fit and proper person to be admitted to the Australian legal profession after previous removal from the Roll' 'Whether the plaintiff has displaced the prior finding of probable permanent unfitness by positively demonstrating rehabilitation']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Davison failed to demonstrate genuine insight into or acceptance of the seriousness of his prior conduct, characterised by a deliberate strategy to avoid tax and bankruptcy obligations over an extended period, as found by prior tribunals and courts. He continued to provide exculpatory explanations and did not positively show a reformed character warranting reinstatement. The court was not satisfied that he was a fit and proper person for readmission, and thus his appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment