William Wayne Moss v Luke McIlveen [2011] NSWCA 77
The application for leave to bring a private prosecution for perjury was refused because the primary judge was correct to find that there was no reasonable prospect of conviction for perjury based on the evidence. There was no credible evidence of judicial bias, and the requirements of s 338 were not met.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal (civil) / Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal From Supreme Court Decision
- Outcome
- Application for leave dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal' 'perjury' 'leave to Prosecute' 'bias of Judge' 'abuse of Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal (civil) / Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal From Supreme Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted leave under s 338 of the Crimes Act 1900 to bring a private prosecution for perjury against the respondent' 'Whether there was bias on the part of the primary judge or denial of procedural fairness' 'Whether the requirements for prosecution for perjury were met']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to bring a private prosecution for perjury was refused because the primary judge was correct to find that there was no reasonable prospect of conviction for perjury based on the evidence. There was no credible evidence of judicial bias, and the requirements of s 338 were not met.
Court Disposition
Application for leave dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Application for leave is dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment