Williams Street Convenience Store Pty Ltd v Kronheim [2021] NSWCATAP 48
There was no amount claimed or in dispute within the appeal, therefore s 60 of the NCAT Act was not displaced and special circumstances were required for a costs order. No special circumstances were established by the appellant, so each party is to pay their own costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application in Appeal / Appeal Panel Determination
- Outcome
- Application for costs dismissed; each party to pay their own costs
- Legal Topics
- ['costs in Tribunal Proceedings' 'special Circumstances for Costs' 'commercial Disputes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application in Appeal / Appeal Panel Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearing of the costs application should be dispensed with' 'Whether special circumstances existed warranting an award of costs for the appeal under s 60 of the NCAT Act' 'Application of rr 38 and 38A of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no amount claimed or in dispute within the appeal, therefore s 60 of the NCAT Act was not displaced and special circumstances were required for a costs order. No special circumstances were established by the appellant, so each party is to pay their own costs.
Court Disposition
Application for costs dismissed; each party to pay their own costs
Orders
- ['A hearing of the application for costs is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).' 'The application for costs is dismissed and each party is to pay their own costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment