Screnci & Anor v Willoughby City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1256
Consent cannot be granted for either the Landscape DA or the Secondary Dwelling DA because the proposed development does not contribute to achieving the objectives of the E4 zone under the Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012 and does not comply with the height and floor space ratio requirements, nor does it justify variation to development standards under cl 4.6 of the 2012 LEP.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Merits of Appeals Regarding Development and Building Certificates
- Outcome
- Consent refused
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'landscaping' 'foreshore Building Line' 'variation of Height Standard' 'secondary Dwellings' 'building Certificates']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Merits of Appeals Regarding Development and Building Certificates
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development is consistent with the objectives of the E4 zone under the Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012' 'Whether the development below the foreshore building line complies with applicable environmental planning instruments and the Development Control Plan' 'Whether variation to height and floor space ratio standards is justified for the secondary dwelling' 'Structural adequacy and compliance of existing retaining walls']
Ratio Decidendi
Consent cannot be granted for either the Landscape DA or the Secondary Dwelling DA because the proposed development does not contribute to achieving the objectives of the E4 zone under the Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012 and does not comply with the height and floor space ratio requirements, nor does it justify variation to development standards under cl 4.6 of the 2012 LEP.
Court Disposition
Consent refused
Orders
- ['The parties are directed to communicate by eCourt by 12.00 on Friday 18 July 2015 with an agreed date for a mention to discuss the further progress of the seven appeals.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment