Champion v Willoughby City Council [2021] NSWLEC 1073
Because there was a statutory basis under Item 11 of Schedule 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to issue a development control order as a Compliance Order, and s 8.18(4) gave the Court broad power on appeal to modify the order or make other orders with respect to it, the agreed modification was a decision the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against a Development Control Order / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- The appeal was upheld in part and the development control order was modified in accordance with Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order' 'compliance Order' 'demolish Works Order' 'roof Tiles on a Dwelling in a Heritage Conservation Area' 'conciliation Conference' 'modification of Order by Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against a Development Control Order / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders modifying the development control order in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether there was statutory power to issue and modify a Compliance Order under Schedule 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and s 8.18(4) of that Act.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because there was a statutory basis under Item 11 of Schedule 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to issue a development control order as a Compliance Order, and s 8.18(4) gave the Court broad power on appeal to modify the order or make other orders with respect to it, the agreed modification was a decision the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
The appeal was upheld in part and the development control order was modified in accordance with Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld in part.' "An order that pursuant to s 8.18(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Development Control Order issued by the Respondent to the Applicants on 30 March 2020 is modified as set out in Annexure 'A'." 'The Order at Annexure A is made pursuant to Division 9.3,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment