WIN Corporation Pty Ltd -v- Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 523
Clause 2.1, read in the legislative framework and factual context, referred only to free-to-air terrestrial broadcasting on and in the licence areas covered by the WIN Stations under BSA licences. Internet live streaming was not "broadcasting" within the meaning of the PSA, and the exclusive licence obtained by WIN was only an exclusive licence to broadcast free-to-air in those licence areas. A term preventing Nine from live streaming was not necessary to give business efficacy to the PSA and would contradict the express bargain as construed. Nine therefore did not breach the PSA and WIN was not entitled to an injunction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Commercial List; Contract Construction and Final Injunction Proceedings / Principal Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['construction of Program Supply Agreement' 'meaning of "broadcast"' 'internet Live Streaming' 'exclusive Licence' 'implied Terms' 'final Injunction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Commercial List; Contract Construction and Final Injunction Proceedings / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether internet live streaming by Nine into the licence areas covered by the WIN Stations was "broadcasting" within the meaning of clause 2.1 of the Program Supply Agreement.' 'Whether the Program Supply Agreement contained an implied term preventing Nine from internet live streaming into the WIN licence areas.' 'Whether WIN should receive a final injunction restraining Nine from live streaming into the WIN licence areas.']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 2.1, read in the legislative framework and factual context, referred only to free-to-air terrestrial broadcasting on and in the licence areas covered by the WIN Stations under BSA licences. Internet live streaming was not "broadcasting" within the meaning of the PSA, and the exclusive licence obtained by WIN was only an exclusive licence to broadcast free-to-air in those licence areas. A term preventing Nine from live streaming was not necessary to give business efficacy to the PSA and would contradict the express bargain as construed. Nine therefore did not breach the PSA and WIN was not entitled to an injunction.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed
Orders
- ['The proceedings are dismissed.' 'The exhibits are to be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment