In the matter of St George Bank – A Division of Westpac Banking Corporation ABN 33 007 457 141 [2015] NSWSC 2052
There was no reason to set aside the order previously made, as service was properly effected at the specified address for service, the applicant was aware of the proceedings, and the statutory demand was patently defective, both in the period for compliance and as the subject of a genuine dispute.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Motion to Set Aside Previous Orders
- Outcome
- Application to set aside judgment dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up' "creditor's Statutory Demand" 'service of Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Motion to Set Aside Previous Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the order setting aside the statutory demand should be set aside' 'Whether service of the application to set aside the demand was properly effected' 'Whether the statutory demand was defective']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no reason to set aside the order previously made, as service was properly effected at the specified address for service, the applicant was aware of the proceedings, and the statutory demand was patently defective, both in the period for compliance and as the subject of a genuine dispute.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside judgment dismissed.
Orders
- ['Notice of Motion dismissed.' "Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion assessed in the sum of $4,400."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment