In the matter of Dalma No 1 Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 111 772 260); Application of Bruce Gleeson and David Shannon in their capacity as joint and several liquidators of Dalma No 1 Pty Limited (in liquidation) and anor [2013] NSWSC 1335
Dalma Constructions Pty Limited was not entitled to subrogation under s 560 or in equity because payments to discharge employee liabilities were made directly and voluntarily, not by the company or under obligation, and without affecting the company’s conscience.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Determination of Questions in Liquidation / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Originating process questions answered: (a) No subrogation under s 560; (b) No equitable subrogation; (c)-(d) Do not arise. Costs declared properly incurred.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up' 'priorities' 'subrogation' 'employee Entitlements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Determination of Questions in Liquidation / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Is Dalma Constructions Pty Limited entitled to subrogate to employee priority claims under s 560 of the Corporations Act 2001?' 'Is Dalma Constructions Pty Limited entitled to equitable subrogation to those claims?' 'Does subrogation extend to premiums paid for group income protection insurance?' 'If subrogation is permitted, how should votes be cast at meetings of creditors?']
Ratio Decidendi
Dalma Constructions Pty Limited was not entitled to subrogation under s 560 or in equity because payments to discharge employee liabilities were made directly and voluntarily, not by the company or under obligation, and without affecting the company’s conscience.
Court Disposition
Originating process questions answered: (a) No subrogation under s 560; (b) No equitable subrogation; (c)-(d) Do not arise. Costs declared properly incurred.
Orders
- ['Questions in originating process answered as follows: (a) No; (b) No; (c) Does not arise; (d) Does not arise.' "Declare First Plaintiffs' costs, including remuneration, are properly incurred for purposes of Corporations Act 2001, s 556(1)(dd) and (de)."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment