WING & ANOR V. MONCRIEFF & ANOR.

WING & ANOR V. MONCRIEFF & ANOR.

The appellants failed to discharge the onus resting upon them to satisfy the court that the testatrix had testamentary capacity at the time of execution of the will. Substantial doubt remained after all evidence was weighed, and the trial judge's finding, based on the weight of evidence (especially medical evidence), that the testatrix lacked capacity or that her capacity was not affirmatively established, should not be disturbed.

Parties
Appellant: Wing & Anor.; Respondent: Moncrieff & Anor.
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 November 1954
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Testamentary Capacity, Onus of Proof, Wills
Succession Probate Testamentary Capacity Onus of Proof Wills

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wing & Anor.

Appellant

Moncrieff & Anor.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment After Hearing Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the deceased possessed testamentary capacity at the time she signed her will on 12th April 1951
  2. 2 Whether the appellants discharged the onus of proof to establish testamentary capacity

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants failed to discharge the onus resting upon them to satisfy the court that the testatrix had testamentary capacity at the time of execution of the will. Substantial doubt remained after all evidence was weighed, and the trial judge's finding, based on the weight of evidence (especially medical evidence), that the testatrix lacked capacity or that her capacity was not affirmatively established, should not be disturbed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs