Lema v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1191
The Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, approving the development application subject to specified conditions, without making a merit assessment of the original issues.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Agreement on Decision After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld, development application approved subject to conditions by agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'minimum Lot Size' 'objection Under Planning Instrument']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Agreement on Decision After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the clause 4.6 objection to minimum lot size should be upheld' 'Whether the development application for subdivision should be approved on agreed terms']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, approving the development application subject to specified conditions, without making a merit assessment of the original issues.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld, development application approved subject to conditions by agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Orders
- ['The clause 4.6 objection to the minimum lot size in clause 4.1 of the Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010 is upheld.' 'The appeal is upheld.' "Development Application No. 16/1322 for the subdivision of lot 61 in deposited plan 882829 into 3 lots at 7 Huxley Street, Mittagong is approved subject to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment