Bruce Robertson v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1584
The Court, being satisfied under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 that an agreement had been reached and that the decision was within its power, made orders to give effect to the agreement without making a merit assessment of the disputed issues.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference Agreement; Final Orders Made
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; costs payable by applicant
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'court Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference Agreement; Final Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the court should dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, being satisfied under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 that an agreement had been reached and that the decision was within its power, made orders to give effect to the agreement without making a merit assessment of the disputed issues.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; costs payable by applicant
Orders
- ["The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on the plans referred to in Condition 2 of Annexure 'A' to this agreement." 'The Appeal is upheld.' "Development Application Number DA17/0195 for the construction of single-storey farm outbuilding at 11 Ormond Street, Sutton Forest is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment