Ng v Wisdom Properties Group Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1359
It would be oppressive to impose the obligation upon Stockland to locate and produce documents dating as far back as 1997, especially when there is no evidence that Stockland possesses such documents or that their production would obviate the need for physical investigation. The subpoena was used for a secondary purpose to obtain evidence for a potential cross-claim, which is not appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Procedural Ruling on Subpoena
- Outcome
- Subpoena set aside
- Legal Topics
- ['subpoena' 'application to Set Aside' 'technology and Construction List']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedural Ruling on Subpoena
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the subpoena served by the defendant on Stockland should be set aside' 'Whether production of documents sought by subpoena would be oppressive' 'Whether subpoena is being used for an improper purpose']
Ratio Decidendi
It would be oppressive to impose the obligation upon Stockland to locate and produce documents dating as far back as 1997, especially when there is no evidence that Stockland possesses such documents or that their production would obviate the need for physical investigation. The subpoena was used for a secondary purpose to obtain evidence for a potential cross-claim, which is not appropriate.
Court Disposition
Subpoena set aside
Orders
- ['The subpoena to produce filed 29 June 2020 served by the Defendant on Stockland Lensworth Glenmore Park Pty Ltd is set aside' "The Defendant pay Stockland's costs of its notice of motion of 25 September 2020"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment