Kozlowski v JSBG Developments Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1022

Kozlowski v JSBG Developments Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1022

Non-compliance with procedural requirements (service, notice, and advertisement) were defects or irregularities but did not cause substantial injustice; presumption of insolvency stands unrebutted; winding up appropriate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 September 2010
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application granted; company to be wound up
Legal Topics
['winding Up for Insolvency' 'statutory Demand' 'procedural Defects' 'advertising Requirements']
['corporations Law'] ['winding Up for Insolvency' 'statutory Demand' 'procedural Defects' 'advertising Requirements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Winding Up Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the company should be wound up for insolvency based on non-compliance with a statutory demand' 'Whether defects or irregularities in the application (including failure to advertise) warrant dismissal' 'Whether failure to advertise the winding up application caused substantial injustice']

Ratio Decidendi

Non-compliance with procedural requirements (service, notice, and advertisement) were defects or irregularities but did not cause substantial injustice; presumption of insolvency stands unrebutted; winding up appropriate.

Court Disposition

Application granted; company to be wound up

Orders

  • ['Order that the defendant, JSBG Developments Pty Ltd (ACN 121 926 770) be wound up.' 'Order that Timothy Paul Heesh of SV Partners Pty Ltd be appointed as liquidator for the defendant.' 'Make no order as to costs of the application.' 'Exhibits A and WK-1 may be returned.' 'Orders are to be entered forthwith.']