Krummrey v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 258

Krummrey v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 258

The Visa was subject to condition 8112 pursuant to the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions. No reviewable error was found in the Tribunal's exercise of discretion to cancel the Visa for breach of condition 8112. The Federal Magistrate's conclusion that the Visa was subject to condition 8112 was correct. Although the Tribunal erred in determining that a change in intention supported cancellation under par 116(1)(a), the appellant's failure on the question of condition 8112 was sufficient for the appeal to fail.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 December 2005
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court to Full Federal Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['visa Cancellation' 'visa Conditions' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court to Full Federal Court

  1. 1 ['Whether visa condition 8112 applied to the Visa' "Whether the Tribunal failed to take into account a matter that it was required to take into account when determining whether to exercise the power to cancel the appellant's visa pursuant to subs 116(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)" 'Whether the Tribunal erred in its construction and application of par 116(1)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)']

Ratio Decidendi

The Visa was subject to condition 8112 pursuant to the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions. No reviewable error was found in the Tribunal's exercise of discretion to cancel the Visa for breach of condition 8112. The Federal Magistrate's conclusion that the Visa was subject to condition 8112 was correct. Although the Tribunal erred in determining that a change in intention supported cancellation under par 116(1)(a), the appellant's failure on the question of condition 8112 was sufficient for the appeal to fail.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondents' costs."]