Wollondilly Retirement Village Pty Limited v Eid & Anor [2002] NSWSC 598
The contract did not reflect the true agreement, which was to convey proposed Lots 1 and 2 of the subdivision of Lot 2, the residue of Lot 1 after sale to Council, and a five-metre strip. Rectification is necessary to correct the contract to give effect to the parties' agreement and remedy the mistake.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Rectification of Contract / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff; contract to be rectified; indemnity costs ordered against defendants
- Legal Topics
- ['rectification of Contract' 'contractual Mistake' 'land Sale Misdescription']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Claim for Rectification of Contract / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the written contract should be rectified to include a five-metre strip of land and part of Lot 1 in DP 997846 agreed to be conveyed but omitted by mistake.']
Ratio Decidendi
The contract did not reflect the true agreement, which was to convey proposed Lots 1 and 2 of the subdivision of Lot 2, the residue of Lot 1 after sale to Council, and a five-metre strip. Rectification is necessary to correct the contract to give effect to the parties' agreement and remedy the mistake.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff; contract to be rectified; indemnity costs ordered against defendants
Orders
- ['The contract is to be rectified in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the amended statement of claim as amended.' "Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs on an indemnity basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment