Wollondilly Shire Council v 820 Cawdor Road Pty Ltd & Anor (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 183
In the circumstances, the respondents were successful in the primary litigation and it was reasonable for them to run all defences pursued; nothing exceptional justified apportioning costs or making indemnity orders. The applicant must pay the respondents’ costs of the proceedings and the motions for costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 / Costs Judgment Following Dismissal of Principal Proceeding
- Outcome
- Applicant's motions for costs dismissed. Applicant to pay respondents' costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'discretion in Costs Awards' 'unlawful Occupation' 'residential Tenancy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 / Costs Judgment Following Dismissal of Principal Proceeding
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should be apportioned between parties in light of partial success and unsuccessful defences' 'Appropriate basis for costs disposition in Class 4 matters after judgment where respondents succeed on key issues but not all']
Ratio Decidendi
In the circumstances, the respondents were successful in the primary litigation and it was reasonable for them to run all defences pursued; nothing exceptional justified apportioning costs or making indemnity orders. The applicant must pay the respondents’ costs of the proceedings and the motions for costs.
Court Disposition
Applicant's motions for costs dismissed. Applicant to pay respondents' costs.
Orders
- ["The applicant's Notice of Motion for costs is dismissed." "The applicant must pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings." 'The applicant must pay the costs of the motions for costs.' "Exhibit 'A' returned."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment