Wollondilly Shire Council v Foxman Environmental Development Services Pty Ltd (No 6) [2013] NSWLEC 143
The Foxman entities did not provide sufficient evidence of prejudice or unfairness that would result from immediate entry of the 22 May 2013 orders; the Court is entitled and required to enter those orders forthwith given no demonstrated basis for a stay.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion in Ongoing Class 4 Proceedings / Application to Stay Entry of Earlier Court Orders
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed with costs. Orders of 22 May 2013 to be entered forthwith.
- Legal Topics
- ['entry of Orders' 'stay of Proceedings' 'variation of Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Ongoing Class 4 Proceedings / Application to Stay Entry of Earlier Court Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there is a basis to stay entry of the Court's orders made on 22 May 2013" "Whether entry of orders would cause unfair prejudice to the respondents' applications to vary those orders"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Foxman entities did not provide sufficient evidence of prejudice or unfairness that would result from immediate entry of the 22 May 2013 orders; the Court is entitled and required to enter those orders forthwith given no demonstrated basis for a stay.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed with costs. Orders of 22 May 2013 to be entered forthwith.
Orders
- ['Notice of motion dismissed with costs.' 'Court directs that the orders made on 22 May 2013 are to be entered forthwith.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment