In the matter of iCash Payment Systems Limited [2013] NSWSC 1084
The orders extending the time for the holding of the meeting and restraining the defendant from proceeding with it were made not just to protect the plaintiffs but to ensure orderly conduct of proceedings and company affairs; vacating them would risk confusion to shareholders and disrupt orderly conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Vacate Interlocutory Orders
- Outcome
- Application to vacate orders refused
- Legal Topics
- ['vacating Interlocutory Orders' 'extraordinary General Meeting' 'notice to Shareholders' 'protection of Parties' 'company Meetings' 'injunction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Vacate Interlocutory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether orders restraining defendant from proceeding with extraordinary general meeting should be vacated when plaintiff no longer seeks their protection' 'Whether vacating orders would cause confusion to shareholders']
Ratio Decidendi
The orders extending the time for the holding of the meeting and restraining the defendant from proceeding with it were made not just to protect the plaintiffs but to ensure orderly conduct of proceedings and company affairs; vacating them would risk confusion to shareholders and disrupt orderly conduct.
Court Disposition
Application to vacate orders refused
Orders
- ["Plaintiff's application to vacate the orders of 8 May 2013 refused" "Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of today"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment