Dolton v Woollahra Council [2012] NSWLEC 1317
The proposal would have a detrimental impact on the heritage significance of the Paddington Heritage Conservation Area, particularly by altering the masonry wall forming part of the street front zone and disrupting the rhythm and character of the Glenmore Road streetscape. The impact is so significant that the condition should be retained and the modification refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Development Consent Condition / Post Hearing, Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Application to modify development consent refused
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'heritage Conservation' 'modification of Development Consent' 'on Site Parking' 'street Front Zone']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Development Consent Condition / Post Hearing, Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the condition requiring deletion of on-site parking should be deleted from the development consent' 'Whether the proposed on-site parking and modifications to the masonry wall would have a detrimental impact on the heritage significance of the Paddington Heritage Conservation Area' 'Whether the proposal breaches relevant objectives and controls of the Paddington HCA Development Control Plan 2008']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal would have a detrimental impact on the heritage significance of the Paddington Heritage Conservation Area, particularly by altering the masonry wall forming part of the street front zone and disrupting the rhythm and character of the Glenmore Road streetscape. The impact is so significant that the condition should be retained and the modification refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Application to modify development consent refused
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The application to modify development consent 452/2011 is refused.' 'The exhibits, other than exhibits 2, A and B, are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment