Woollahra Council v Duarte (No 3) [2013] NSWLEC 70
Given the respondent's current lack of representation, her distressed state, and potential prejudice if forced to proceed, and given the dictates of justice per the Civil Procedure Act 2005, the Court grants the application to vacate the hearing dates and relist the matter for a short date.
- Parties
- Applicant: Woollahra Council; First Respondent: Charmaine Duarte; Second Respondent: Rodney Duarte
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Hearing Dates
- Outcome
- Application to vacate hearing granted; orders made as per judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Vacation of Hearing Dates, Adjournment, Exercise of Discretion, Representation of Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Woollahra Council
Applicant
Charmaine Duarte
First Respondent
Rodney Duarte
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 4 / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Hearing Dates
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to vacate the hearing listed for 21 and 22 May 2013 for a second time
- 2 Whether the dictates of justice require the adjournment in circumstances of the first respondent's lack of legal representation and personal distress
Ratio Decidendi
Given the respondent's current lack of representation, her distressed state, and potential prejudice if forced to proceed, and given the dictates of justice per the Civil Procedure Act 2005, the Court grants the application to vacate the hearing dates and relist the matter for a short date.
Court Disposition
Application to vacate hearing granted; orders made as per judgment.
Orders
- Vacate the hearing listed for 21 and 22 May 2013.
- Fix the hearing of these proceedings for Monday 24 June 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment