Pearce v Woollahra Municipal Council [2023] NSWLEC 1122
Because the parties reached agreement on amended plans and conditions and the Commissioner was satisfied, after considering the relevant statutory planning matters, that granting consent was a decision the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required by section 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Under Section 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Actual Refusal of a Development Application / Conciliation Conference Under Section 34 AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Orders Made by Agreement of the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application No DA24/2022 as amended, subject to conditions of consent in Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'demolition and Construction of Dwelling House' 'amended Plans' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'basix Affected Development' 'contaminated Land' 'coastal Zone' 'sydney Harbour Catchment' 'building Height' 'acid Sulfate Soils' 'earthworks']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Under Section 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Actual Refusal of a Development Application / Conciliation Conference Under Section 34 AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Orders Made by Agreement of the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could give effect to the parties' agreement to grant development consent to Development Application No DA24/2022 as amended, subject to conditions." 'Whether the amended development application satisfied relevant statutory planning considerations, including notification, BASIX, contamination, coastal zone, Sydney Harbour Catchment, zoning, building height, acid sulfate soils, earthworks and draft planning controls.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement on amended plans and conditions and the Commissioner was satisfied, after considering the relevant statutory planning matters, that granting consent was a decision the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required by section 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application No DA24/2022 as amended, subject to conditions of consent in Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to Development Application No DA24/2022, as amended, for the demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a new five storey dwelling with pool and a garage at land identified as Lot A in Deposited Plan 332414, known as 62 Beresford Roased NSW 2023,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment