Murrell v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1247
The matter was disposed of by agreement pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, with the presiding Commissioner satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could properly make, resulting in orders that reflected the parties' negotiated outcome without a merits assessment.
- Parties
- First Applicant: George Murrell; Second Applicant: Deidre Murrell; Respondent: Woollahra Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld by agreement under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Building Information Certificate, Section 34(3) Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Murrell
First Applicant
Deidre Murrell
Second Applicant
Woollahra Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 between parties can dispose of proceedings
- 2 Whether the agreed decision is one the Court could have made in proper exercise of its functions
Ratio Decidendi
The matter was disposed of by agreement pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, with the presiding Commissioner satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could properly make, resulting in orders that reflected the parties' negotiated outcome without a merits assessment.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld by agreement under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Orders
- The First and Second Applicant be granted leave to rely upon specified plans prepared by David White Architects with respect to Building Certificate Application ref. 62/2016.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment