Worimi Local Aboriginal Land Council v Minister for Lands for the State of New South Wales (No 2) [2008] FCA 1929
The Land Council proved on the balance of probabilities that no native title exists in relation to Lot 576. The Court held that there is no presumption of native title, that the Land Council was not required to prove and then disprove every element of native title, and that the absence of any claimant application after notification supported an inference of no native title. The Aboriginal evidence called by the Land Council denied the asserted laws and customs relating to Lot 576, and Worimi’s evidence, including his assertions about a women's site, custodianship and traditional use, did not sufficiently establish or cast doubt by reference to a continuing normative system of traditional...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Non Claimant Application for an Approved Determination of Native Title Under the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) / Final Judgment and Order
- Outcome
- Application allowed; determination made that no native title exists in relation to Lot 576.
- Legal Topics
- ['non Claimant Application' 'determination That No Native Title Exists' 'burden of Proof' 'evidentiary Burden' 'traditional Laws and Customs' 'role of State Minister as Party' 'notification and Joinder']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Non Claimant Application for an Approved Determination of Native Title Under the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) / Final Judgment and Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the role of the Minister in the proceedings?' 'What is the burden of proof on the Land Council and on Worimi?' 'Is there a presumption that native title exists over the Land?' 'Does the description of the Land as part of "traditional Worimi country" establish a presumption of native title?' 'Must the Land Council provide evidence to negative the existence of native title over Lot 576 to the extent of negativing each of the elements of native title under the Act?' 'In order to defeat a prima facie case of no native title, must Worimi adduce evidence of each of the elements of native title under the Act?' 'What does the evidence as a whole establish about the existence or absence of native title over Lot 576?']
Ratio Decidendi
The Land Council proved on the balance of probabilities that no native title exists in relation to Lot 576. The Court held that there is no presumption of native title, that the Land Council was not required to prove and then disprove every element of native title, and that the absence of any claimant application after notification supported an inference of no native title. The Aboriginal evidence called by the Land Council denied the asserted laws and customs relating to Lot 576, and Worimi’s evidence, including his assertions about a women's site, custodianship and traditional use, did not sufficiently establish or cast doubt by reference to a continuing normative system of traditional...
Court Disposition
Application allowed; determination made that no native title exists in relation to Lot 576.
Orders
- ['No native title exists in relation to NSW Department of Lands Certificate of Title folio identifier 576 in Deposited Plan 48823 and located in the Local Government Area of Port Stephens, Parish of Tomaree, County of Gloucester, State of New South Wales.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment