Workers Compensation (Dust Diseases) Board v Wallace [2005] NSWCA 353
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant accepted that all grounds other than those based on double compensation should fail, and double compensation had nothing to do with the issue on appeal, namely Quirk DCJ's overturning of the medical authority's decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / New South Wales Court of Appeal Appeal From the District Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['double Compensation' 'medical Authority Decision']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / New South Wales Court of Appeal Appeal From the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether grounds based on the principle of double compensation could sustain the appeal.' "Whether the principle of double compensation was relevant to Quirk DCJ's overturning of the decision of the medical authority."]
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant accepted that all grounds other than those based on double compensation should fail, and double compensation had nothing to do with the issue on appeal, namely Quirk DCJ's overturning of the medical authority's decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment