SafeWork NSW v Stitt [2024] NSWDC 396

SafeWork NSW v Stitt [2024] NSWDC 396

The offender knowingly failed to engage a licenced scaffolder for work at height, resulting in the death of a worker due to unsafe scaffolding practices. The offence was objectively serious, with a high risk of fatality, and required significant general deterrence, mitigated to a limited extent by remorse, lack of prior convictions, and improvements to safety. A conviction and a substantial fine of $100,000 are warranted despite the offender's financial hardship.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Conviction recorded and fine imposed.
Legal Topics
['work Health and Safety' 'duty of Employers' 'risk of Death or Serious Injury' 'sentencing Principles' 'objective Seriousness' 'deterrence' 'aggravating Factors' 'mitigating Factors' 'scaffolding Regulations']
['criminal Law' 'work Health and Safety Law' 'sentencing'] ['work Health and Safety' 'duty of Employers' 'risk of Death or Serious Injury' 'sentencing Principles' 'objective Seriousness' 'deterrence' 'aggravating Factors' 'mitigating Factors' 'scaffolding Regulations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["What is the appropriate sentence for the offender's breach of s 32 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 resulting in the death of a worker?" 'What weight is to be given to aggravating and mitigating factors in the context of work health and safety offending?' "To what extent should the offender's capacity to pay influence the amount of the financial penalty imposed?"]

Ratio Decidendi

The offender knowingly failed to engage a licenced scaffolder for work at height, resulting in the death of a worker due to unsafe scaffolding practices. The offence was objectively serious, with a high risk of fatality, and required significant general deterrence, mitigated to a limited extent by remorse, lack of prior convictions, and improvements to safety. A conviction and a substantial fine of $100,000 are warranted despite the offender's financial hardship.

Court Disposition

Conviction recorded and fine imposed.

Orders

  • ['Jason Reid Stitt is convicted.' 'A fine of $100,000 imposed.' 'Pursuant to s 122(2) Fines Act 1996, 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.' "The offender is to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed."]