Workout Gym Pty Ltd v Crackerjack Investments Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 751

Workout Gym Pty Ltd v Crackerjack Investments Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 751

A genuine dispute exists as to the respondent's entitlement to enforce the judgment, because there is evidence before the Court raising the potential for proceedings for rectification of the Settlement Agreement, which goes to the root of the debt's existence under s 459H.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 July 1997
Procedural Posture
Corporations Law Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Hearing and Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
['statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'rectification of Agreement' 'enforcement of Judgment' 'settlement Agreements']
['corporations Law'] ['statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'rectification of Agreement' 'enforcement of Judgment' 'settlement Agreements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Law Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Hearing and Judgment at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a genuine dispute existed as to the existence of a debt for the purposes of s 459H of the Corporations Law' 'Relevance of a potential claim for rectification of a settlement agreement in determining a genuine dispute under s 459H']

Ratio Decidendi

A genuine dispute exists as to the respondent's entitlement to enforce the judgment, because there is evidence before the Court raising the potential for proceedings for rectification of the Settlement Agreement, which goes to the root of the debt's existence under s 459H.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • ['The statutory demand dated 19 February 1997 served on the applicant by the respondent is set aside.' 'No order as to costs.']