Inspector Batty v Waste Equipment Pty Ltd & Anor [2009] NSWIRComm 60

Inspector Batty v Waste Equipment Pty Ltd & Anor [2009] NSWIRComm 60

Both defendants failed to ensure a safe system of work by permitting painting with flammable substances to occur in proximity to hot work without proper risk assessment, supervision, instruction, or provision of safety information, resulting in a serious foreseeable risk and grievous injury to an employee, which constitutes a serious offence warranting substantial penalty despite mitigating factors.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Judgment and Sentencing
Outcome
guilty
Legal Topics
['workplace Safety' 'sentencing' 'risk Assessment' 'hot Work and Flammable Substances' 'supervision' 'penalties']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Judgment and Sentencing

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendants failed to ensure the health, safety and welfare at work of employees by not providing a safe system for painting and fabrication.' 'Whether hot work was conducted in proximity to flammable substances in breach of applicable standards and regulations.' 'Whether adequate supervision, instruction, training, and information were provided to employees.' 'Whether risk assessments were conducted and proper protective equipment provided.']

Ratio Decidendi

Both defendants failed to ensure a safe system of work by permitting painting with flammable substances to occur in proximity to hot work without proper risk assessment, supervision, instruction, or provision of safety information, resulting in a serious foreseeable risk and grievous injury to an employee, which constitutes a serious offence warranting substantial penalty despite mitigating factors.

Court Disposition

guilty

Orders

  • ['Corporate defendant fined $120,000 with a moiety to WorkCover Authority of NSW.' 'Individual defendant fined $20,000 with a moiety to WorkCover Authority of NSW.' 'Both defendants to pay in equal share the costs of the prosecution as agreed or to be assessed.']