Inspector Batty v Waste Equipment Pty Ltd & Anor [2009] NSWIRComm 60
Both defendants failed to ensure a safe system of work by permitting painting with flammable substances to occur in proximity to hot work without proper risk assessment, supervision, instruction, or provision of safety information, resulting in a serious foreseeable risk and grievous injury to an employee, which constitutes a serious offence warranting substantial penalty despite mitigating factors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Judgment and Sentencing
- Outcome
- guilty
- Legal Topics
- ['workplace Safety' 'sentencing' 'risk Assessment' 'hot Work and Flammable Substances' 'supervision' 'penalties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Judgment and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendants failed to ensure the health, safety and welfare at work of employees by not providing a safe system for painting and fabrication.' 'Whether hot work was conducted in proximity to flammable substances in breach of applicable standards and regulations.' 'Whether adequate supervision, instruction, training, and information were provided to employees.' 'Whether risk assessments were conducted and proper protective equipment provided.']
Ratio Decidendi
Both defendants failed to ensure a safe system of work by permitting painting with flammable substances to occur in proximity to hot work without proper risk assessment, supervision, instruction, or provision of safety information, resulting in a serious foreseeable risk and grievous injury to an employee, which constitutes a serious offence warranting substantial penalty despite mitigating factors.
Court Disposition
guilty
Orders
- ['Corporate defendant fined $120,000 with a moiety to WorkCover Authority of NSW.' 'Individual defendant fined $20,000 with a moiety to WorkCover Authority of NSW.' 'Both defendants to pay in equal share the costs of the prosecution as agreed or to be assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment