WP Keighery Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [1957] HCA 2

WP Keighery Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [1957] HCA 2

On 30 June 1952, the company was not 'capable of being controlled' by Mr. and Mrs. Keighery as required by s. 105(1)(f), because their power to redeem preference shares was not immediate and depended on future events. Nor did any group of up to seven shareholders have the majority of voting power; the preference...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court Judgment After Original Decision by Williams J.
Outcome
Appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
['income Tax Assessment—private Company Definition—control Under S. 105 Income Tax and Social Services Contribution Assessment Act 1936 1952' 'redeemable Preference Shares' 'application of S. 260']
['taxation Law' 'company Law'] ['income Tax Assessment—private Company Definition—control Under S. 105 Income Tax and Social Services Contribution Assessment Act 1936 1952' 'redeemable Preference Shares' 'application of S. 260']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Full Court Judgment After Original Decision by Williams J.

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether WP Keighery Pty Ltd was a 'private company' under s. 105(1) of the Income Tax and Social Services Contribution Assessment Act 1936-1952 for the relevant period." "Whether redeemable preference shares bearing a variable rate of dividend count as 'shares bearing a fixed rate of dividend only' for the purposes of s. 105(1)(c) and (e)." "Whether the company's structure enabled 'control' by one or not more than seven persons on the last day of the year of income (30 June 1952), including by exercise of directors' power to redeem shares." 'Whether s. 260 avoided the arrangements for issuing preference shares as an arrangement to defeat tax liability.']

Ratio Decidendi

On 30 June 1952, the company was not 'capable of being controlled' by Mr. and Mrs. Keighery as required by s. 105(1)(f), because their power to redeem preference shares was not immediate and depended on future events. Nor did any group of up to seven shareholders have the majority of voting power; the preference shares did not bear a 'fixed rate of dividend only'. The arrangement to have more than 20 shareholders and redeemable preference shares was a legitimate choice under the Act and not void under s. 260. Therefore, the company was not a 'private company' for the purposes of Division 7 tax.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed.

Orders

  • ['Order appealed from discharged.' 'Appeal from the assessment of the Commissioner of Taxation allowed with costs.' 'The assessment set aside.']